Sr. Content Developer at Microsoft, working remotely in PA, TechBash conference organizer, former Microsoft MVP, Husband, Dad and Geek.
164363 stories
·
33 followers

BONUS AI Makes Starting Work Easy, But Flow Still Finishes It With Liz Rettig

1 Share

BONUS: AI Makes Starting Work Easy, But Flow Still Finishes It

AI is changing software teams, but Liz Rettig brings the conversation back to flow, strategy, and the discipline of finishing. In this BONUS episode, Vasco and Liz explore how Scrum Masters can use AI to make policies visible, help teams manage WIP, support Product Owners, and keep the organization focused on valuable slices instead of faster output alone.

From Anthropology To Kanban And AI

"As a Scrum Master, you're an anthropologist because you're watching people and you're recording how they are working."

 

Liz starts with her path from anthropology to Scrum Mastering, agile coaching, and professional Kanban training. That background matters because her work has always been about observing how people interact with systems. AI did not replace that skill. It made the system easier to see. In one client engagement, a team adopting an agentic framework also needed agile ways of working around that new capability. Liz saw that AI could help teams reach forecasting, strategy, and board-reading conversations much faster than before, as long as the human system was still designed with intent.

AI Helps Teams See Flow Earlier

"This is a tool that can help me get teams further quicker than ever before."

 

Liz describes AI as a practical accelerator for visibility. Instead of spending months collecting and cleaning data by hand, teams can use AI-enabled tools to surface the information already living in Jira, code repositories, customer feedback, and flow metrics systems. That changes the coaching conversation. Scrum Masters and agile coaches no longer need to persuade teams that the data could exist. They can bring the data into the room and ask what it means for the way work is moving.

Starting Is Free, Finishing Is Still The Discipline

"Starting is free with AI, and I get into that pickle all the time too."

 

The central warning from Liz is simple: AI makes it easier to start work, but it does not automatically make teams finish the right work. She connects this directly to Kanban practices: limit work in progress, watch aging work, make policies explicit, and help the team focus on moving existing items before pulling more into the system. Liz has used AI hooks, skills, commands, and team rules to remind people when they are about to break their own policies. The point is not to block people blindly. The point is to make the tradeoff visible, capture why the team chose to break a WIP limit, and bring that evidence into retrospectives.

Scrum Masters Can Put Team Policies Into The AI System

"Everybody has the ability to run it, and I expect everybody on the team to run it."

 

Liz does not keep the AI-enabled flow tools as a coaching black box. She works with teams to define their policies, then embeds those policies into the tools the team uses every day. A daily board walk can highlight aging work, blocked items, WIP issues, and the topics worth discussing in the daily review of flow or daily Scrum. This shifts the Scrum Master's work away from repeating reminders and toward helping the team interpret what they see. AI becomes a way to make the team's agreements visible and repeatable.

Leaders Still Need Outcome Conversations

"Everybody wants more faster."

 

Liz is clear that many organizations begin AI adoption with an output goal: more stories, more work items, more projects, less time. One client moved from roughly 75 items per month to around 400. That created a new and more important question: are those 400 items connected to the value the organization actually wants? Liz explains how AI helped reorganize work around objectives, key results, epics, and delivery data so leadership could see how throughput was being spent. The useful conversation was not "how much more did we do?" It was "how much of our capacity went to strategy, bugs, maintenance, and the work we said mattered?"

The Constraint Moves Left

"The constraint that we're finding is having the right work that aligns to the strategy ready in our backlog."

 

When delivery gets faster, the bottleneck often moves toward product strategy, customer discovery, and backlog readiness. Liz saw teams capable of shipping far more work than before, but the business was not always ready with the strategic work it wanted delivered. That makes Product Owners more important, not less. AI can help with the administrative side: checking whether a ticket already exists, turning customer conversations into well-structured work items, and keeping Jira cleaner. But Liz argues that Product Owners still need time to talk with customers, shape direction, and decide what is worth building.

Smaller Slices Matter More With AI

"Now we've just built the wrong thing faster."

 

Liz pushes back on the idea that AI makes big upfront specifications or waterfall thinking attractive again. If teams use AI to build large batches faster, they can also waste budget faster. Her answer is smaller valuable slices, delivered incrementally, with feedback built into the way the team works. She has used AI to help break epics into customer-facing slices rather than functional layers. That matters because the team can validate learning earlier, change direction cheaply, and keep the work connected to customer value.

About Liz Rettig

Liz Rettig is founder of Lil Agile Monster and a Professional Kanban Trainer. She helps teams use Kanban, flow metrics, and real data to improve predictability. Her work spans healthcare, insurance, marketing, portfolio Kanban, and AI-assisted delivery. LinkedIn: lizrettig-agilecoach.

 

You can link with Liz Rettig on LinkedIn, visit Lil Agile Monster, and explore Liz's Kanban Playbook.





Download audio: https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/scrummastertoolbox/20261105_Liz_Rettig_Thu.mp3?dest-id=246429
Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
22 minutes ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete

Abundant Intelligence at the Midwest AI Summit Part 2

1 Share

How do organizations decide what AI should do, where to set boundaries, and when to keep humans in control? In this episode, Don Barger of the International Mission Board shares how establishing an AI charter helped define what the organization would and wouldn't use AI for. Mark Lay of Noblis explores four key decisions for managing AI across an organization, from delegation and accountability to technical debt. And Darren Taillie of Aerocore Technologies walks through how his team uses AI agents, text-to-SQL, and vision models to improve data access and automate work order verification.

Featuring: 

Links:

Sponsors:

  • SerpAPI: A Web Search API that gives developers real-time, structured access to search engine results. Visit serpapi.com/practicalai to get started for free and get 250 searches every month. 

Resources and Events:

Chris’s new book The Art of Swarming will be published soon, written to be the seminal foundational book for the fledgling swarming industry, defining the principles and architecture that enable autonomous agentic UxS swarms with emergent distributed embodied intelligence.





Download audio: https://pscrb.fm/rss/p/dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.transistor.fm/1b301bdc/b7154aa0.mp3
Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
1 hour ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete

Discord to Drop Electron and React Native, Rewriting Its Clients in Rust With GPUI

1 Share

Discord's co-founder and CTO has outlined plans to drop Electron and React Native and rewrite the entire client in Rust, using GPUI for the desktop interface. An early screen of the new Discord Phoenix client shows memory usage of 290.2MB.

Key points

  • What happened: Discord announced plans to drop Electron and React Native and fully rewrite its desktop and mobile clients using Rust and GPUI
  • Why it matters: The current Electron version has grown to consume 1–2GB of memory continuously, prompting tests of automatic restarts at 4GB. Adopting GPUI means moving to rendering without a browser engine

Read the full article on Joho no Todai · Japanese original

Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
1 hour ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete

Linux Mint 27 arrives next month, and I like it already: New features and other upgrades to expect

1 Share
It starts with a surprise version number: Linux Mint 27 instead of 24. But the next release brings far more changes than that.

Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
1 hour ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete

Three Default Thinking Modes That Can Screw Up Your Planning and Vision

1 Share

Your brain is constantly trying to simplify the world. It takes a snapshot of what it sees, builds a picture that makes sense, and then works from that picture. Most of the time this works well enough. But when we plan projects, set goals, or try to predict where something is headed, these default modes of thinking can lead us in the wrong direction. In today's episode, I cover three of these defaults: linear thinking, static thinking, and infinite or non-discrete thinking. I also talk about how they show up in your career and in the way engineering leaders set vision for their teams.

  • Static Thinking and the Snapshot Problem: We tend to fix our beliefs about people very quickly, which is why first impressions carry so much weight. If someone acts a certain way in one meeting, we assume that's how they act in every meeting. This is closely related to the fundamental attribution error, where we treat a person's behavior in one moment as a permanent part of who they are instead of a response to their environment.
  • Linear Thinking and Exponential Change: When something is changing, we assume it will keep changing at about the same rate. AI agents are a good counterexample. Research suggests their effectiveness roughly doubles on a timescale of a few months, and even if the exact numbers are off, the curve is exponential. That kind of growth is hard to picture intuitively, and it probably won't last forever. At some point it will likely level off into something closer to logarithmic.
  • Where Our Intuition Comes From: Nonlinear patterns are all around us in nature. Think about how quickly heat rises as you move your hand toward a fire, or how loudness changes as you get closer to a speaker. But our social lives mostly involve slow, roughly linear change, and over the course of human history our minds have adapted to that kind of linear model.
  • Your Career Isn't a Straight Line: Many of us expect our salary and growth to rise steadily, in steps, for our whole careers. That expectation often breaks down, especially later on, and it makes exponential income growth hard to even imagine.
  • Infinite Thinking and Missing Endpoints: We aren't naturally good at thinking in discrete stages. We rarely design our careers in phases or plan for how they end until those moments are right in front of us. Cultural habits like contributing to a retirement account do some of that planning for us almost by accident, but most areas of our lives get no such help.
  • Two Traps for Engineering Leaders: When setting direction for a team or department, leaders often fall into one of two traps. The first is a "forever vision," an unbounded picture of perfection that the org is supposed to chase. The second is purely linear planning, where you only do the next thing in front of you and never step back to look further ahead.
  • The Productive Middle: The most useful vision work usually happens on a timescale of months to years. That's harder than it sounds, because it calls for a concrete plan, a lot of saying no, and putting the pieces together in a discrete way that doesn't come naturally to us.
  • Episode Homework: Becoming aware of these defaults is the first step. Add linear, static, and infinite thinking to your planning checklist. Next time you set a goal or a vision, ask yourself which of these defaults might be shaping your picture of reality.

📮 Ask a Question

If you enjoyed this episode and would like me to discuss a question that you have on the show, drop it over at: developertea.com.

📮 Join the Discord

If you want to be a part of a supportive community of engineers (non-engineers welcome!) working to improve their lives and careers, join us on the Developer Tea Discord community today!

🗞️ Subscribe to The Tea Break

We are developing a brand new newsletter called The Tea Break! You can be the first in line to receive it by entering your email directly over at developertea.com.

🧡 Leave a Review

If you're enjoying the show and want to support the content head over to iTunes and leave a review!





Download audio: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.simplecast.com/audio/c44db111-b60d-436e-ab63-38c7c3402406/episodes/d8ff4482-bed7-4647-b93f-4e4b7561d67a/audio/9cd8ec85-960d-4863-ad74-f3c321035629/default_tc.mp3?aid=rss_feed&feed=dLRotFGk
Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
1 hour ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete

The Future We Were Promised Geek Out

1 Share
Whatever happened to the future we were promised? Time for a Geek Out! To celebrate the end of the opening history bits, Richard pulls together all the most popular topics of "things we were supposed to get in the future." From flying and self-driving cars to fusion power, personal jetpacks, Star Trek replicators, space tourism, and more! While some things are coming true, in a form different from what was expected, other things continue to be very difficult - and there is no sign of when that future will come. The future is here, just not exactly the one we thought it would be!



Download audio: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/76101431/dotnetrocks_2027_the_future_we_were_promised_geek_out.mp3
Read the whole story
alvinashcraft
1 hour ago
reply
Pennsylvania, USA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories