Log in
For years, persuasion has been the most valuable skill in digital commerce. Brands spend millions on ad copy, testing button colours, and designing landing pages to encourage people to click “Buy Now.” All of this assumes the buyer is a person who can see. But an autonomous AI shopping agent does not have eyes.
I recently ran an experiment to see what happens when a well-designed buying agent visits two types of online stores: one built for people, one built for machines. Both stores sold hiking jackets. Merchant A used the kind of marketing copy brands have refined for years: “The Alpine Explorer. Ultra-breathable all-weather shell. Conquers stormy seas!” Price: $90. Merchant B provided only raw structured data: no copy, just a JSON snippet {"water_resistance_mm": 20000}. Price: $95. I gave the agent a single instruction: “Find me the cheapest waterproof hiking jacket suitable for the Scottish Highlands.”
The agent quickly turned my request into clear requirements, recognizing that “Scottish Highlands” means heavy rain and setting a minimum water resistance of 15,000–20,000 mm. I ran the test 10 times. Each time, the agent bought the more expensive jacket from Merchant B. The agent completely bypassed the cheaper option due to the data’s formatting.
The reason lies in the Sandwich Architecture: the middle layer of deterministic code that sits between the LLM’s intent translation and its final decision. When the agent checked Merchant A, this middle layer attempted to match “conquers stormy seas” against a numeric requirement. Python gave a validation error, the try/except block caught it, and the cheaper jacket was dropped from consideration in 12 milliseconds. This is how well-designed agent pipelines operate. They place intelligence at the top and bottom, with safety checks in the middle. That middle layer is deterministic and literal, systematically filtering out unstructured marketing copy.
How the Sandwich Architecture works
A well-built shopping agent operates in three layers, each with a fundamentally different job.
Layer 1: The Translator. This is where the LLM does its main job. A human says something vague and context-laden—”I need a waterproof hiking jacket for the Scottish Highlands”—and the model turns it into a structured JSON query with explicit numbers. In my experiment, the Translator consistently mapped “waterproof” to a minimum water_resistance_mm between 10,000 and 20,000mm. Across 10 runs, it stayed focused and never hallucinated features.
Layer 2: The Executor. This critical middle layer contains zero intelligence by design. It takes the structured query from the Translator and checks each merchant’s product data against it. It relies entirely on strict type validation instead of reasoning or interpretation. Does the merchant’s water_resistance_mm field contain a number greater than or equal to the Translator’s minimum? If yes, the product passes. If the field contains a string such as “conquers stormy seas,” the validation fails immediately. These Pydantic type checks treat ambiguity as absence. In a production system handling real money, a try/except block cannot be swayed by good copywriting or social proof.
Layer 3: The Judge. The surviving products are passed to a second LLM call that makes the final selection. In my experiment, this layer simply picked the cheapest option. In more complex scenarios, the Judge evaluates value against specific user preferences. The Judge selects exclusively from a preverified shortlist.
This three-layer pattern (LLM → deterministic code → LLM) reflects how engineering teams build most serious agent pipelines today. DocuSign’s sales outreach system uses a similar structure: An LLM agent composes personalized outreach based on lead research. A deterministic layer then enforces business rules before a final agent reviews the output. DocuSign found the agentic system matched or beat human reps on engagement metrics while significantly cutting research time. The reason this pattern keeps appearing is clear: LLMs handle ambiguity well, while deterministic code provides reliable, strict validation. The Sandwich Architecture uses each where it’s strongest.
Want Radar delivered straight to your inbox? Join us on Substack. Sign up here.
This is precisely why Merchant A’s jacket vanished. The Executor tried to parse “Ultra-breathable all-weather shell” as an integer and failed. The Judge received a list containing exactly one product. In an agentic pipeline, the layer deciding whether your product is considered cannot process standard marketing.
From storefronts to structured feeds
If ad copy gets filtered out, merchants must expose the raw product data—fabric, water resistance, shipping rules—already sitting in their PIM and ERP systems. To a shopping agent validating a breathability_g_m2_24h field, “World’s most breathable mesh” triggers a validation error that drops the product entirely. A competitor returning 20000 passes the filter. Persuasion is mathematically lossy. Marketing copy compresses a high-information signal (a precise breathability rating) into a low-information string that cannot be validated. Information is destroyed in the translation, and the agent cannot recover it.
The emerging standard for solving this is the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP). UCP asks merchants to publish a capability manifest: one structured Schema.org feed that any compliant agent can discover and query. This migration requires a fundamental overhaul of infrastructure. Much of what an agent needs to evaluate a purchase is currently locked inside frontend React components. Every piece of logic a human triggers by clicking must be exposed as a queryable API. In an agentic market, an incomplete data feed leads to complete exclusion from transactions.
Why telling agents not to buy your product is a good strategy
Exposing structured data is only half the battle. Merchants must also actively tell agents not to buy their products. Traditional marketing casts the widest net possible. You stretch claims to broaden appeal, letting returns handle the inevitable mismatches. In agentic commerce, that logic inverts. If a merchant describes a lightweight shell as suitable for “all weather conditions,” a human applies common sense. An agent takes it literally. It buys the shell for a January blizzard, resulting in a return three days later.
In traditional ecommerce, that return is a minor cost of doing business. In an agentic environment, a return tagged “item not as described” generates a persistent trust discount for all future interactions with that merchant. This forces a strategy of negative optimization. Merchants must explicitly code who their product is not for. Adding "not_suitable_for": ["sub-zero temperatures", "heavy snow"] prevents false-positive purchases and protects your trust score. Agentic commerce heavily prioritizes postpurchase accuracy, meaning overpromising will steadily degrade your product’s discoverability.
From banners to logic: How discounts become programmable
Just as agents ignore marketing language, they cannot respond to pricing tricks. Open any online store and you’ll encounter countdown timers or banners announcing flash sales. Promotional marketing tactics like fake scarcity rely heavily on human emotions. An AI agent does not experience scarcity anxiety. It treats a countdown timer as a neutral scheduling parameter.
Discounts change form. Instead of visual triggers, they become programmable logic in the structured data layer. A merchant could expose conditional pricing rules: If the cart value exceeds $200 and the agent has verified a competing offer below $195, automatically apply a 10% discount. This is a fundamentally different incentive. It serves as a transparent, machine-readable contract. The agent directly calculates the deal’s mathematical value. With the logic exposed directly in the payload, the agent can factor it into its optimization across multiple merchants simultaneously. When the buyer is an optimization engine, transparency becomes a competitive feature.
Where persuasion migrates
The Sandwich Architecture’s middle layer is persuasion-proof by design. For marketing teams, structured data is no longer a backend concern; it is the primary interface. Persuasion now migrates to the edges of the transaction. Before the agent runs, brand presence still shapes the user’s initial prompt (e.g., “find me a North Face jacket”). After the agent filters the options, human buyers often review the final shortlist for high-value purchases. Furthermore, operational excellence builds algorithmic trust over time, acting as a structural form of persuasion for future machine queries. You need brand presence to shape the user’s initial prompt and operational excellence to build long-term algorithmic trust. Neither matters if you cannot survive the deterministic filter in the middle.
Agents are now browsing your store alongside human buyers. Brands treating digital commerce as a purely visual discipline will find themselves perfectly optimized for humans, yet invisible to the agents. Engineering and commercial teams must align on a core requirement: Your data infrastructure is now just as critical as your storefront.
