In the explosive era of Agentic AI, we’re not just seeking more powerful models—we’re searching for a development experience that lets developers actually get some sleep. When building Agents locally, we’ve traditionally faced three major challenges:
Today, I’ll walk you through a classic case from Microsoft Agent Framework Samples—GHModel.AI—to reveal the “Golden Triangle” development stack that perfectly solves these pain points: DevUI, AG-UI, and OpenTelemetry.
Let’s explore how this powerful combination empowers the entire local development lifecycle.
In the GHModel.AI case, we first address the “brain” problem.
Traditional local development is often constrained by computing resources or expensive API keys. This case cleverly leverages GitHub Models. As an evangelist, I must strongly recommend this combination:
In this case’s code structure, you’ll find Agent definitions become exceptionally clear. No more spaghetti-style Python/C# scripts—just structured “declarations.”
# Python - Create Agents with GitModels
from agent_framework.openai import OpenAIChatClient
chat_client = OpenAIChatClient(
base_url=os.environ.get("GITHUB_ENDPOINT"), #
GitHub Models API endpoint
api_key=os.environ.get("GITHUB_TOKEN"), #
Authentication token
model_id=os.environ.get("GITHUB_MODEL_ID") #
Selected AI model
)
# Create Concierge Agent
CONCIERGE_AGENT_NAMES = "Concierge"
CONCIERGE_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS = """
You are an are hotel concierge who has opinions about providing the most local and authentic experiences for travelers.
The goal is to determine if the front desk travel agent has recommended the best non-touristy experience for a traveler.
If so, state that it is approved.
If not, provide insight on how to refine the recommendation without using a specific example. """
concierge_agent = chat_client.create_agent(
instructions=CONCIERGE_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS,
name=CONCIERGE_AGENT_NAMES,
)
# Create FrontDesk Agent
FRONTEND_AGENT_NAMES = "FrontDesk"
FRONTEND_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS = """
You are a Front Desk Travel Agent with ten years of experience and are known for brevity as you deal with many customers.
The goal is to provide the best activities and locations for a traveler to visit.
Only provide a single recommendation per response.
You're laser focused on the goal at hand.
Don't waste time with chit chat.
Consider suggestions when refining an idea.
"""
frontend_agent = chat_client.create_agent(
instructions=FRONTEND_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS,
name=FRONTEND_AGENT_NAMES,
)
# Create Workflow
frontend_executor = AgentExecutor(frontend_agent, id="frontend_agent")
concierge_executor = AgentExecutor(concierge_agent, id="concierge_agent")
workflow = (
WorkflowBuilder()
.set_start_executor(frontend_executor)
.add_edge(frontend_executor, concierge_executor)
.build()
)
// .NET - Creat Agents with GitHub Models
var openAIOptions = new OpenAIClientOptions()
{
Endpoint = new Uri(github_endpoint)
};
var openAIClient = new OpenAIClient(new ApiKeyCredential(github_token), openAIOptions);
var chatClient = openAIClient.GetChatClient(github_model_id).AsIChatClient();
const string ReviewerAgentName = "Concierge";
const string ReviewerAgentInstructions = @"
You are an are hotel concierge who has opinions about providing the most local and authentic experiences for travelers.
The goal is to determine if the front desk travel agent has recommended the best non-touristy experience for a traveler.
If so, state that it is approved.
If not, provide insight on how to refine the recommendation without using a specific example. ";
const string FrontDeskAgentName = "FrontDesk";
const string FrontDeskAgentInstructions = @"""
You are a Front Desk Travel Agent with ten years of experience and are known for brevity as you deal with many customers.
The goal is to provide the best activities and locations for a traveler to visit.
Only provide a single recommendation per response.
You're laser focused on the goal at hand.
Don't waste time with chit chat.
Consider suggestions when refining an idea.
""";
var reviewerAgentBuilder = new AIAgentBuilder(chatClient.CreateAIAgent(
name: ReviewerAgentName,
instructions: ReviewerAgentInstructions));
var frontDeskAgentBuilder = new AIAgentBuilder(chatClient.CreateAIAgent(
name: FrontDeskAgentName,
instructions: FrontDeskAgentInstructions));
AIAgent reviewerAgent = reviewerAgentBuilder.Build(serviceProvider);
AIAgent frontDeskAgent = frontDeskAgentBuilder.Build(serviceProvider);
// Create Workflow
var workflow = new WorkflowBuilder(frontDeskAgent)
.AddEdge(frontDeskAgent, reviewerAgent)
.Build();
This is the highlight of this article. Previously, we debugged Agents using the print() method and endless console logs. Now, we have DevUI.
What is DevUI? It’s an “inner-loop” tool designed specifically for developers within Agent Framework. When GHModel.AI runs, DevUI provides a visual console:
Chain of Thought Visualization: You no longer need to guess why the Agent chose Tool A over Tool B. In DevUI, you can see each Reasoning, Action, and Observation step like a flowchart. This isn’t just debugging—it’s an “X-ray” of Agent behavior.
Real-Time State Monitoring: What’s stored in the Agent’s Memory? Is the context overflowing? DevUI lets you view Conversation State in real-time, quickly pinpointing the root cause of “hallucinations.”
cd GHModel.Python.AI/GHModel.Python.AI.Workflow.DevUI
pip install agent-framework agent-framework-devui python-dotenv
python main.py
# Browser opens automatically at http://localhost:8090
cd GHModel.dotNET.AI/GHModel.dotNET.AI.Workflow.DevUI
dotnet run
# DevUI: https://localhost:50516/devui
# OpenAI API: https://localhost:50516/v1/responses
DevUI dramatically shortens the "write-run-fix" feedback loop. For complex Multi-Agent collaboration scenarios, it's your command center.
Debugging is done, and your boss says: “Can you send me a link so I can try it too?” At this moment, don’t hand-write a React frontend! What you need is AG-UI (Agent Generic UI).
What does AG-UI solve? It’s a standardized Agent-User interaction protocol. In the GHModel.AI case, by integrating AG-UI:
Streaming responses (SSE)
Backend tool rendering
Human-in-the-Loop approvals
Shared state synchronization
Seamless CopilotKit integrationPython Server:
# Server — Register AG-UI endpoint
from agent_framework_ag_ui import add_agent_framework_fastapi_endpoint
from workflow import workflow
app = FastAPI()
agent = workflow.as_agent(name="Travel Agent")
add_agent_framework_fastapi_endpoint(app, agent, "/")
// Program.cs — ASP.NET Core AG-UI endpoint registration
using Microsoft.Agents.AI.Hosting.AGUI.AspNetCore;
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddAGUI();
var app = builder.Build();
AIAgent workflowAgent = ChatClientAgentFactory.CreateTravelAgenticChat();
app.MapAGUI("/", workflowAgent);
await app.RunAsync();
The transition from DevUI to AG-UI is a seamless switch from “developer perspective” to “user perspective.” We can use CopilotKit to create UI
Before the Agent goes live, besides functioning correctly, we must answer: “Is it fast? Is it expensive?”
This is where OpenTelemetry (OTel) enters. In Agent Framework, OpenTelemetry support is baked-in. In GHModel.AI code, typically just one line of configuration (like AddOpenTelemetry or setup_observability):
Distributed Tracing: When a request comes in, passes through routing, Guardrails, calls GitHub Models, and returns results—OTel generates a complete Flame Graph. You can precisely see:
Cost Transparency: Combined with OTel Metrics, we can monitor Token consumption rates. This is crucial for cost estimation when migrating from GitHub Models (free/prototype stage) to Azure OpenAI (paid/production stage).
Quick SetupPython:
# Enable telemetry in one line
from agent_framework.observability import setup_observability
from agent_framework import setup_logging
setup_observability()
setup_logging()
.NET:
// OpenTelemetry configuration
var tracerProvider = Sdk.CreateTracerProviderBuilder()
.AddSource("*Microsoft.Agents.AI")
.AddOtlpExporter(options => options.Endpoint = new Uri("http://localhost:4317"))
.Build();
Environment Variables:
ENABLE_OTEL=true
ENABLE_SENSITIVE_DATA=true # Enable sensitive data logging in dev
OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://localhost:4317 # Aspire Dashboard / OTLP Collector
APPLICATIONINSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING=... # Azure Application Insights (optional)
Visualization Options| Platform | Use Case | Quick Start |
|---|---|---|
| Aspire Dashboard | Local development | docker run --rm -d -p 18888:18888 -p 4317:18889 mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspire-dashboard:latest |
| Application Insights | Production monitoring | Set APPLICATIONINSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING |
| Grafana Dashboards | Advanced visualization | Agent Overview, Workflow Overview |


Returning to the GHModel.AI case, it’s not just a code sample—it demonstrates best practice architecture for modern Agent development:
| Layer | Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Model Layer | GitHub Models | Rapidly validate ideas with free, cutting-edge models |
| Debug Layer | DevUI | Gain “God Mode View,” iterate logic quickly |
| Presentation Layer | AG-UI | Standardize output, generate user interfaces in seconds |
| Observability Layer | OpenTelemetry | Data-driven optimization, no more guesswork |
I encourage every Agent developer to dive deep into the code in Agent-Framework-Samples. Stop debugging AI with Notepad—arm yourself with these modern weapons and go build next-generation intelligent applications!
The combination of GitHub Models for rapid prototyping, DevUI for visual debugging, AG-UI for seamless user interaction, and OpenTelemetry for production-grade observability represents a paradigm shift in how we build agentic applications.
Your Agent development journey starts here. The future is agentic. Let’s build it together!
The post The “Golden Triangle” of Agentic Development with Microsoft Agent Framework: AG-UI, DevUI & OpenTelemetry Deep Dive appeared first on Semantic Kernel.

Most AI demos look impressive in a notebook, but they fall apart the moment they touch real data, real users, or real scale. The companies that will win in 2026 aren’t the ones with the flashiest prototypes, they’re the ones who can reliably design, debug, and deploy agent-powered AI applications.
That’s exactly why we created the OSS AI Summit.
On December 10th we’re bringing together people from LangChain and Microsoft for a focused, no-fluff 2-hour online event centered on LangChain v1 and the patterns that turn experiments into production systems.
We’re sharing three complete reference apps so you can explore the concepts hands-on:
• AI Sales Analyst – Python agent that analyzes real sales data in PostgreSQL using LangChain + Azure OpenAI + MCP
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/langchain-agent-python
• AI Travel Agency – Multi-agent system in LangChain.js with MCP servers in Python, Node.js, Java, and .NET, deployed on Azure Container Apps
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/ai-travel-agents
• Serverless Burger-Order Agent – End-to-end LangChain.js agent using MCP to place orders via a real API, running on Azure Static Web Apps + Azure Functions
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/mcp-agent-langchainjs
Date: December 10, 2025
Time: 8:00 – 10:00 AM Pacific Time
Format: Free live stream
Register: https://aka.ms/OSSAISummitRegistration
We’ll see you there. 
Microsoft is bringing back its ugly sweaters for the holiday season. After taking a break for 2024, the company has an “Artifact” holiday sweater with lots of retro iconography, an even uglier Zune brown option, and even a green Xbox version.
Clippy was the star of Microsoft’s ugly sweater in 2022, and the Artifact option this year puts the paperclip at the center, surrounded by MSN, Minesweeper, Internet Explorer, MS-DOS, and plenty of Windows logos. The Zune brown holiday sweater has a play button that I really hope lights something up. Both the Artifact and Zune sweaters are available for $79.95, and the Xbox sweater can be pre-ordered for $59.95.
Microsoft first started sending out ugly sweaters to Windows fans in 2018, and then sold them to customers from 2020 onwards. For some reason the software maker didn’t ship an ugly sweater in 2024, but this year’s sweaters can be purchased through Microsoft’s online company store or its brick and mortar version in Redmond, Washington. Microsoft will also have its holiday sweaters available at its Microsoft store (experience center) in New York City.
Technical debt is one of the most persistent challenges facing enterprise development teams today. Studies show that organizations spend 20% of their IT budget on technical debt instead of advancing new capabilities. Whether it’s upgrading legacy frameworks, migrating to newer runtime versions, or refactoring outdated code patterns, these essential but repetitive tasks consume valuable developer time that could be spent on innovation.
Today, we’re excited to announce AWS Transform custom, a new agent that fundamentally changes how organizations approach modernization at scale. This intelligent agent combines pre-built transformations for Java, Node.js, and Python upgrades with the ability to define custom transformations. By learning specific transformation patterns and automating them across entire codebases, customers using AWS Transform custom have achieved up to 80% reduction in execution time in many cases, freeing developers to focus on innovation.
You can define transformations using your documentation, natural language descriptions, and code samples. The service then applies these specific patterns consistently across hundreds or thousands of repositories, improving its effectiveness through both explicit feedback and implicit signals like developers’ manual fixes within your transformation projects.
AWS Transform custom offers both CLI and web interfaces to suit different modernization needs. You can use the CLI to define transformations through natural language interactions and execute them on local codebases, either interactively or autonomously. You can also integrate it into code modernization pipelines or workflows, making it ideal for machine-driven automation. Meanwhile, the web interface provides comprehensive campaign management capabilities, helping teams track and coordinate transformation progress across multiple repositories at scale.
Language and framework modernization
AWS Transform supports runtime upgrades without the need to provide additional information, understanding not only the syntax changes required but also the subtle behavioral differences and optimization opportunities that come with newer versions. The same intelligent approach applies to Node.js, Python and Java runtime upgrades, and even extends to infrastructure-level transitions, such as migrating workloads from x86 processors to AWS Graviton.
It also navigates framework modernization with sophistication. When organizations need to update their Spring Boot applications to take advantage of newer features and security patches, AWS Transform custom doesn’t merely update version numbers but understands the cascading effects of dependency changes, configuration updates, and API modifications.
For teams facing more dramatic shifts, such as migrating from Angular to React, AWS Transform custom can learn the patterns of component translation, state management conversion, and routing logic transformation that make such migrations successful.
Infrastructure and enterprise-scale transformations
The challenge of keeping up with evolving APIs and SDKs becomes particularly acute in cloud-based environments where services are continuously improving. AWS Transform custom supports AWS SDK updates across a broad spectrum of programming languages that enterprises use including Java, Python, and JavaScript. The service understands not only the mechanical aspects of API changes, but also recognizes best practices and optimization opportunities available in newer SDK versions.
Infrastructure as Code transformations represent another critical capability, especially as organizations evaluate different tooling strategies. Whether you’re converting AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) templates to Terraform for standardization purposes, or updating AWS CloudFormation configurations to access new service features, AWS Transform custom understands the declarative nature of these tools and can maintain the intent and structure of your infrastructure definitions.
Beyond these common scenarios, AWS Transform custom excels at addressing the unique, organization-specific code patterns that accumulate over years of development. Every enterprise has its own architectural conventions, utility libraries, and coding standards that need to evolve over time. It can learn these custom patterns and help refactor them systematically so that institutional knowledge and best practices are applied consistently across the entire application portfolio.
AWS Transform custom is designed with enterprise development workflows in mind, enabling center of excellence teams and system integrators to define and execute organization-wide transformations while application developers focus on reviewing and integrating the transformed code. DevOps engineers can then configure integrations with existing continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines and source control systems. It also includes pre-built transformations for Java, Node.js and Python runtime updates which can be particularly useful for AWS Lambda functions, along with transformations for AWS SDK modernization to help teams get started immediately.
Getting started
AWS Transform makes complex code transformations manageable through both pre-built and custom transformation capabilities. Let’s start by exploring how to use an existing transformation to address a common modernization challenge: upgrading AWS Lambda functions due to end-of-life (EOL) runtime support.
For this example, I’ll demonstrate migrating a Python 3.8 Lambda function to Python 3.13, as Python 3.8 reached EOL and is no longer receiving security updates. I’ll use the CLI for this demo, but I encourage you to also explore the web interface’s powerful campaign management capabilities.
First, I use the command atx custom def list to explore the available transformation definitions. You can also access this functionality through a conversational interface by typing only atx instead of issuing the command directly, if you prefer.
This command displays all available transformations, including both AWS-managed defaults and any existing custom transformations created by users in my organization. AWS-managed transformations are identified by the AWS/ prefix, indicating they’re maintained and updated by AWS. In the results, I can see several options such as AWS/java-version-upgrade for Java runtime modernization, AWS/python-boto2-to-boto3-migration for updating Python AWS SDK usage, AWS/nodejs-version-upgrade for Node.js runtime updates.
For my Python 3.8 to 3.13 migration, I’ll use the AWS/python-version-upgrade transformation.
You run a migration by using the atx custom def exec command. Please consult the documentation for more details about the command and all its options. Here, I run it against my project repository specifying the transformation name. I also add pytest to run unit tests for validation. More importantly, I use the additionalPlanContext section in the --configuration input to specify which Python version I want to upgrade to. For reference, here’s the command I have for my demo (I’ve used multiple lines and indented it here for clarity):
atx custom def exec
-p /mnt/c/Users/vasudeve/Documents/Work/Projects/ATX/lambda/todoapilambda
-n AWS/python-version-upgrade
-C "pytest"
--configuration
"additionalPlanContext= The target Python version to upgrade to is Python 3.13"
-x -t
AWS Transform then starts the migration process. It analyzes my Lambda function code, identifies Python 3.8-specific patterns, and automatically applies the necessary changes for Python 3.13 compatibility. This includes updating syntax for deprecated features, modifying import statements, and adjusting any version-specific behaviors.
After execution, it provides a comprehensive summary including a report on dependencies updated in requirements.txt with Python 3.13-compatible package versions, instances of deprecated syntax replaced with current equivalents, updated runtime configuration notes for AWS Lambda deployment, suggested test cases to validate the migration, and more. It also provides a body of evidence that serve as proof of success.
The migrated code lives in a local branch so you can review and merge when satisfied. Alternatively, you can keep providing feedback and reiterating until yo’re happy that the migration is fully complete and meets your expectations.
This automated process changes what would typically require hours of manual work into a streamlined, consistent upgrade that maintains code quality while maintaining compatibility with the newer Python runtime.
Creating a new custom transformation
While AWS-managed transformations handle common scenarios effectively, you can also create custom transformations tailored to your organization’s specific needs. Let’s explore how to create a custom transformation to see how AWS Transform learns from your specific requirements.
I type atx to initialize the atx cli and start the process.
The first thing it asks me is if I want to use one of the existing transformations or create a new one. I choose to create a new one. Notice that from here on the whole conversation takes place using natural language, not commands. I typed new one but I could have typed I want to create a new one and it would’ve understood it exactly the same.
It then prompts me to provide more information about the kind of transformation I’d like to perform. For this demo, I’m going to migrate an Angular application, so I type angular 16 to 19 application migration which prompts the CLI to search for all transformations available for this type of migration. In my case, my team has already created and made available a few Angular migrations, so it shows me those. However, it warns me that none of them is an exact match to my specific request for migrating from Angular 16 to 19. It then asks if I’d like to select from one of the existing transformations listed or create a custom one.
I choose to create a custom one by continuing to use natural language and typing create a new one as a command. Again, this could be any variation of that statement provided that you indicate your intentions clearly. It follows by asking me a few questions including whether I have any useful documentation, example code or migration guides that I can provide to help customize the transformation plan.
For this demo, I’m only going to rely on AWS Transform to provide me with good defaults. I type I don't have these details. Follow best practices. and the CLI responds by telling me that it will create a comprehensive transformation definition for migrating Angular 16 to Angular 19. Of course, I relied on the pre-trained data to generate results based on best practices. As usual, the recommendation is to provide as much information and relevant data as possible at this stage of the process for better results. However, you don’t need to have all the data upfront. You can keep on providing data at any time› as you iterate through the process of creating the custom transformation definition.
The transformation definition is generated as a markup file containing a summary and a comprehensive sequence of implementation steps grouped logically into phases such as premigration preparation, processing and partitioning, static dependency analysis, searching and applying specific transformation rules, and step-by-step migration and iterative validation.
It’s interesting to see that AWS Transform opted for the best practice of doing incremental framework updates creating steps for migrating the application first to 17 then 18 then 19 instead of trying to go directly from 16 to 19 to minimize issues.
Note that the plan includes various stages of testing and verification to confirm that the various phases can be concluded with confidence. At the very end, it also includes a final validation stage listing exit criteria that performs a comprehensive set of tests against all aspects of the application that will be used to accept the migration as successfully complete.
After the transformation definition is created, AWS Transform asks me about what I would like to do next. I can choose to review or modify the transformation definition and I can reiterate through this process as much as I need until I arrive at one that I’m satisfied with. I can also choose to already apply this transformation definition to an Angular codebase. However, first I want to make this transformation available to my team members as well as myself so we can all use it again in the future. So, I choose option 4 to publish this transformation to the registry.
This custom transformation needs a name and a description of its objective which is displayed when users browse the registry. AWS Transforms automatically extracts those from context for me and asks me if I would like to modify them before going ahead. I like the sensible default of “Angular-16-to-19-Migration”, and the objective is clearly stated, so I choose to accept the suggestions and publish it by answering with yes, looks good.
Now that the transformation definition is created and published, I can use it and run it multiple times against any code repository. Let’s apply the transformation to a code repository with a project written in Angular 16. I now choose option 1 from the follow-up prompt and the CLI asks me for the path in my file system to the application that I want to migrate and, optionally, the build command that it should use.
After I provide that information, AWS Transform proceeds to analyze the code base and formulate a thorough step-by-step transformation plan based on the definition created earlier. After it’s done, it creates a JSON file containing the detailed migration plan specifically designed for applying our transformation definition to this code base. Similar to the process of creating the transformation definition, you can review and iterate through this plan as much as you need, providing it with feedback and adjusting it to any specific requirements you might have.
When I’m ready to accept the plan, I can use natural language to tell AWS Transform that we can start the migration process. I type looks good, proceed and watch the progress in my shell as it starts executing the plan and making the changes to my code base one step at a time.
The time it takes will vary depending on the complexity of the application. In my case, it took a few minutes to complete. After it has finished, it provides me with a transformation summary and the status of each one of the exit criteria that were included in the final verification phase of the plan alongside all the evidence to support the reported status. For example, the Application Build – Production criteria was listed as passed and some of the evidence provided included the incremental Git commits, the time that it took to complete the production build, the bundle size, the build output message, and the details about all the output files created.
Conclusion
AWS Transform represents a fundamental shift in how organizations approach code modernization and technical debt. The service helps to transform what was at one time a fragmented, team-by-team effort into a unified, intelligent capability that eliminates knowledge silos, keeping your best practices and institutional knowledge available as scalable assets across the entire organization. This helps to accelerate modernization initiatives while freeing developers to spend more time on innovation and driving business value instead of focusing on repetitive maintenance and modernization tasks.
Things to know
AWS Transform custom is now generally available. Visit the get started guide to start your first transformation campaign or check out the documentation to learn more about setting up custom transformation definitions.
Earlier this year in May, we announced the general availability of AWS Transform for .NET, the first agentic AI service for modernizing .NET applications at scale. During the early adoption period of the service, we received valuable feedback indicating that, in addition to .NET application modernization, you would like to modernize SQL Server and legacy UI frameworks. Your applications typically follow a three-tier architecture—presentation tier, application tier, and database tier—and you need a comprehensive solution that can transform all of these tiers in a coordinated way.
Today, based on your feedback, we’re excited to announce AWS Transform for full-stack Windows modernization, to offload complex, tedious modernization work across the Windows application stack. You can now identify application and database dependencies and modernize them in an orchestrated way through a centralized experience.
AWS Transform accelerates full-stack Windows modernization by up to five times across application, UI, database, and deployment layers. Along with porting .NET Framework applications to cross-platform .NET, it migrates SQL Server databases to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL-Compatible Edition with intelligent stored procedure conversion and dependent application code refactoring. For validation and testing, AWS Transform deploys applications to Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) Linux or Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), and provides customizable AWS CloudFormation templates and deployment configurations for production use. AWS Transform has also added capabilities to modernize ASP.NET Web Forms UI to Blazor.
There is much to explore, so in this post I’ll provide the first look at AWS Transform for full-stack Windows modernization capabilities across all layers.
Create a full-stack Windows modernization transformation job
AWS Transform connects to your source code repositories and database servers, analyzes application and database dependencies, creates modernization waves, and orchestrates full-stack transformations for each wave.
To get started with AWS Transform, I first complete the onboarding steps outlined in the getting started with AWS Transform user guide. After onboarding, I sign in to the AWS Transform console using my credentials and create a job for full-stack Windows modernization.
After creating the job, I complete the prerequisites. Then, I configure the database connector for AWS Transform to securely access SQL Server databases running on Amazon EC2 and Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS). The connector can connect to multiple databases within the same SQL Server instance.
Next, I set up a connector to connect to my source code repositories.
Furthermore, I have the option to choose if I would like AWS Transform to deploy the transformed applications. I choose Yes and provide the target AWS account ID and AWS Region for deploying the applications. The deployment option can be configured later as well.
After the connectors are set up, AWS Transform connects to the resources and runs the validation to verify IAM roles, network settings, and related AWS resources.
After the successful validation, AWS Transform discovers databases and their associated source code repositories. It identifies dependencies between databases and applications to create waves for transforming related components together. Based on this analysis, AWS Transform creates a wave-based transformation plan.
Assessing database and dependent applications
For the assessment, I review the databases and source code repositories discovered by AWS Transform and choose the appropriate branches for code repositories. AWS Transform scans these databases and source code repositories, then presents a list of databases along with their dependent .NET applications and transformation complexity.
I choose the target databases and repositories for modernization. AWS Transform analyzes these selections and generates a comprehensive SQL Modernization Assessment Report with a detailed wave plan. I download the report to review the proposed modernization plan. The report includes an executive summary, wave plan, dependencies between databases and code repositories, and complexity analysis.
Wave transformation at scale
The wave plan generated by AWS Transform consists of four steps for each wave. First, it converts the SQL Server schema to PostgreSQL. Second, it migrates the data. Third, it transforms the dependent .NET application code to make it PostgreSQL compatible. Finally, it deploys the application for testing.
Before converting the SQL Server schema, I can either create a new PostgreSQL database or choose an existing one as the target database.
After I choose the source and target databases, AWS Transform generates conversion reports for my review. AWS Transform converts the SQL Server schema to PostgreSQL-compatible structures, including tables, indexes, constraints, and stored procedures.
For any schema that AWS Transform can’t automatically convert, I can manually address them in the AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) console. Alternatively, I can fix them in my preferred SQL editor and update the target database instance.
After completing schema conversion, I have the option to proceed with data migration, which is an optional step. AWS Transform uses AWS DMS to migrate data from my SQL Server instance to the PostgreSQL database instance. I can choose to perform data migration later, after completing all transformations, or work with test data by loading it into my target database.
The next step is code transformation. I specify a target branch for AWS Transform to upload the transformed code artifacts. AWS Transform updates the codebase to make the application compatible with the converted PostgreSQL database.
With this release, AWS Transform for full-stack Windows modernization supports only codebases in .NET 6 or later. For codebases in .NET Framework 3.1+, I first use AWS Transform for .NET to port them to cross-platform .NET. I’ll expand on this in a following section.
After the conversion is completed, I can view the source and target branches along with their code transformation status. I can also download and review the transformation report.
Modernizing .NET Framework applications with UI layer
One major feature we’re releasing today is the modernization of UI frameworks from ASP.NET Web Forms to Blazor. This is added to existing support for modernizing model-view-controller (MVC) Razor views to ASP.NET Core Razor views.
As mentioned previously, if I have a .NET application in legacy .NET Framework, then I continue using AWS Transform for .NET to port it to cross-platform .NET. For legacy applications with UIs built on ASP.NET Web Forms, AWS Transform now modernizes the UI layer to Blazor along with porting the backend code.
AWS Transform for .NET converts ASP.NET Web Forms projects to Blazor on ASP.NET Core, facilitating the migration of ASP.NET websites to Linux. The UI modernization feature is enabled by default in AWS Transform for .NET on both the AWS Transform web console and Visual Studio extension.
During the modernization process, AWS Transform handles the conversion of ASPX pages, ASCX custom controls, and code-behind files, implementing them as server-side Blazor components rather than web assembly. The following project and file changes are made during the transformation:
| From | To | Description |
| *.aspx, *.ascx | *.razor | .aspx pages and .ascx custom controls become .razor files |
| Web.config | appsettings.json | Web.config settings become appsettings.json settings |
| Global.asax | Program.cs | Global .asax code becomes Program.cs code |
| *.master | *layout.razor | Master files become layout.razor files |
Other new features in AWS Transform for .NET
Along with UI porting, AWS Transform for .NET has added support for more transformation capabilities and enhanced developer experience. These new features include the following:
Things to know
Some more things to know are:
– Prasad