In a conversation between a group of software developers recently, one of them talked about how many attempts it took them using Claude Code to get a good result.
The consensus was that devs who needed fewer tries were better at using the tool. But I’m not so sure…
I’ve recently been spending my weekends and early mornings “vibe-coding” a browser-based tool with Claude Code for folks to use in online modular design workshops – in the definitive Karpathy sense that I wasn’t even looking at the code being generated. (When I did finally peek at the code, I regretted it.) And it’s been through a lot of iterations and many, many tweaks to get it into the ballpark of what I consider good enough for the workshops.
So I must be doing it wrong, right?
Or do I just have a clearer sense of what I want?
Take two film directors – Ed Wood and Stanley Kubrick. Wood famously rarely did more than one take on any of his movies. Kubrick did many, many takes. Kubrick must have been doing it wrong, no?
Or was he just less easily satisfied? Watch their two most famous science fiction films back to back and let me know who you think was the better director.
There’s some research that suggests that the divide between the “I did 3 months’ work in 3 hours with Claude” and the “It would have been quicker to do it myself” folks might be more plausibly attributed to the height of their quality bar than to actual AI skills.